Jacinda, just do it

COVID-19 decisions that looked brave less than three days ago, now look hesitant. More is going to be needed.

Less than three days ago, I gave credit to the Government for moving ‘hard and early’, in a paraphrase of Prime Minister Ardern’s words. I thought there was a realistic chance that the travel restrictions and limits on mass events might be sufficient to hold COVID-19 at bay. I no longer think that is going to be sufficient.

My change in thinking arises because of the increasing awareness I have as to the number of tourists who have still been entering New Zealand in the last week from high-risk countries. Also, there are several thousand Kiwis who, aided by AirNZ laying on wide-body jets, managed to get into New Zealand on Sunday night without being required to self-isolate. I am also influenced by concern that not everyone who should self-isolate is going to do so.

I take note of the Prime Minister’s statement of Monday 16 March in regard to cancelling mass events with more than 500 people. I doubt greatly whether that will make a crucial difference. That group size is far too large.

I also note the Prime Minister’s words about Taiwan, where they have had some but not total success without shutting schools. However, in Taiwan, students at their desks are separated by plastic partitions. Also, it is standard practice for parents to test the temperature of their children before they leave for school in the morning and this data is fed into the school’s on-line database. These sorts of behaviours, and there are others, are profoundly different to how we operate in New Zealand.

There is now a very high probability that within the next week we will see evidence for community transmission. This transmission will have already occurred now, but the incubation takes a while to show up. By then at the very least we need to have all steps in place to press the lockdown button. Even that may be too late.

The real question is whether to do it in the next few days when no one has died or is seriously ill, or wait until we are surrounded by illness and death.

A serious lockdown would mean no schools, cinemas. nightclubs, gyms, bars, shopping malls or church services. Workers in essential trades such as plumbers and electricians would still be able to attend to breakdowns, together with essential maintenance of infrastructure. Office workers could only work from home. Supermarkets would stay open as would pharmacies. Of course, health-care workers would continue to carry out all duties.

The one exception might, at least in the short term, be schools. The social consequences of shutting schools are profound, but that is what much of the world is now doing.

All of the above sounds awful and it would be very stressful. But this is what Italy, Spain, France and Germany are already doing. The USA and Canada are also rapidly shutting down.

As for the United Kingdom, there are frightening tales coming out of the United Kingdom in the last two days from their officials and politicians that the UK Government intends to rely on herd immunity. This means allowing and even encouraging all young and middle-aged people to become infected, with all people over 70 years of age required to stay in their homes for four months while this is going on. I kid you not.

The herd immunity theory relies on the assumption that once enough people are infected and thereafter develop immunity, then the transmission rate from person to person will drop below a level of one and the disease will thereby die out. However, with increasing evidence for very high transmission rates, with each infected person on average possibly infecting between four and six additional people, there is a very high risk that the strategy will fail. This is because the herd immunity may not be effective until as much of 85 percent of people have been infected. In any case, it is not only old people who die from this disease.

The reason the UK is thinking of doing this is because they fear they have already lost the war and have no other option.

If we act quickly in New Zealand then there is a good chance that we could quickly eliminate the disease from our country. But if we pussy-foot around then the UK scenario could well come into play.

If we look at Italy, which let the disease run ahead before bringing in draconian measures, then the death rate is now approaching eight percent of all cases, with this death rate climbing further each day. This is a very different story than was evident some one-to-two weeks ago.

Every other European country is destined to follow the same path as Italy unless they can succeed with their total lockdowns. With hindsight, they have all been too slow.

If New Zealand goes for a strong control process then everyone would have to self-isolate in family or other living groups. Act quickly and there is a good chance we could eliminate the disease in three to four weeks, or at least be getting close.

Right now, there is a mass flow of Kiwis coming home, all of whom are meant to go into self-isolation on arrival. This is more likely to work in an environment where everyone is self-isolating and hence those who cheat can be identified. In any case, once group events are completely stopped, then the opportunities for super-spreading by any self-isolation cheats are greatly reduced.

By the end of the month these incoming Kiwis will be down to a trickle. It would be reasonable and realistic for anyone coming in thereafter to require approval and to undergo a Government-administered quarantine at their own expense. If Kiwis want to come home, then now is the time for this to happen.

Hopefully the Government is already working on the scenario that I have laid out above. It would come as a shock to most New Zealanders, but community attitudes have been undergoing a remarkable transformation in recent days.

If we were to act quickly – certainly before the end of this week – then we may well have achieved freedom from the virus by the end of Easter. The international drawbridge would then have to stay up, but life could go back to becoming relatively normal within the country. I think it is worth a try.

The risks from not doing this are now too great.

 

About Keith Woodford

Keith Woodford is an independent consultant, based in New Zealand, who works internationally on agri-food systems and rural development projects. He holds honorary positions as Professor of Agri-Food Systems at Lincoln University, New Zealand, and as Senior Research Fellow at the Contemporary China Research Centre at Victoria University, Wellington.
This entry was posted in COVID-19. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Jacinda, just do it

  1. Howard de Klerk says:

    Self isolation is a joke. A man returning from a hotspot is self isolating with his family. His wife teaches at uni and 2 kids are at different schools. They will be going about their business merrily spreading the virus on his behalf. Quarentining 1 person in a house is a joke.

    • Keith Woodford says:

      Howard,
      Yes, in that situation it means the quarantining person has to avoid face to face contact with other family members in the same house and keep at least one metre away. We have social responsibilities to do that. it would make sense for it to include all family members self-isolating as a family group. The alternative is much stricter quarantining.
      Keith

  2. David Porter says:

    Thanks Keith. I agree that social isolation is the best way to stop transmission but do you think it is possible from a social and practical point of view? If it was four four to six weeks, it would likely work but self-isolation to break the transmission chain is going to have to happen, at least on and off, until a vaccine is available. It will be very interesting to watch Wuhan over the coming weeks for any signs of reignition of the epidemic.

    The UK herd immunity theory is very brutal but until there is herd immunity or a vaccine, will there not be sporadic outbreaks as people begin to move about and come and go from overseas. To avoid this, a police state is required. From what I heard (I’m always suspicious whenever I hear that phrase from someone else!), even people as inured to a police state as the Chinese started to get a bit fractious by the end of their enforced isolation. For us being used to hugely more freedom than the Chinese, it wouldn’t be long before there was mass disobedience don’t you think? You then have the UK solution anyway, just delayed by a few months and now a large part of the population has lost confidence/trust in the authorities.

    Also, to enforce isolation and all that goes with it until there is a vaccine will collapse a significant part of the economy within which the employees are notoriously low paid with little savings to buy food and pay rent after days let alone months without work. What then becomes of them? The government will be borrowing huge sums of money as it is without having to completely fund about a third of the populations living costs.

    I’m playing devils advocate here but does the UK “get it over with and move on solution” then become more attractive?

    • Keith Woodford says:

      David
      With that approach they will in all likelihood lose control and have horrendous death rates.
      Totally crazy in my opinion
      We have to try as hard as we can to eradicate the disease and if we fail then at least we should have greatly flattened the curve and given health sysytems a chance to minimise deaths.
      Keith

  3. jbj4549 says:

    As ever thank goodness you’ve said this. We’ve just managed to get home from Austria via Germany as both borders were about to close. People in Austria are forbidden to leave home apart from supermarket, pharmacy or bank on pain of a big fine. Draconian but correct I feel.
    Yes, we despair at the UKs lack of action. Herd Immunity theory, hortifying!!! Today some new action may be happening, but yes far too late.
    NZ don’t make the same mistake.

  4. Greg van Paassen says:

    The ‘rainy day’ package announced by Grant Robertson yesterday is encouraging. Our government seems to understand, as others don’t, both that without strong well-aimed action, many more people will die from being made homeless or other economic disasters than directly from the virus, and the scale of the action needed.

    The Australian Treasury’s advice in the GFC – “go early, go hard, go households” applies even more this time.

    Bridges’s complaint just betrays his economic ignorance (or cynicism and narcissism). Beneficiaries will spend almost all of the extra they receive on goods and services supplied by low waged people (retail workers, etc). Highly paid people would probably just sock it away, negating the purpose of the money injection. Giving money to beneficiaries is a quick way of targeting money to many of the workers and businesses who need it, and not to those who don’t.

    • Keith Woodford says:

      My concern, even more than one day ago, is that the government is not going hard enough. At the very least, self-isolation has to relate to whole family or living groups. The flaw in the current self-isolation system is now obvious.
      Keith

    • David Porter says:

      I agree Greg that lower paid people (not just beneficiaries) will cycle any money received into purchases in the immediate to short term.
      I don’t necessarily agree that giving money to highly paid people is not good sense though. They may well spend the money straight away but even if they put it away, it is still useful to the economy at times like this. You mention the GFC where one of the real problems was liquidity in the markets and banks. Putting aside the banks’ attitude to risk an injection of liquidity into them is very necessary at times like this as it was in the GFC. If the more brave highly paid decide that there are bargains to be had on the stock exchange, cash coming in will provide a floor to share prices. A crashing share price will kill companies as quickly as customers not coming in through the door.

  5. Pingback: The day New Zealand lost the plot | Posts from Keith Woodford

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s